Anatomy of Perceval

Entries from October 2007

Moving On

October 29, 2007 · Leave a Comment

The first draft of chapter one of book 3 (Perceval in Love or PIL) is done.  I finished it last week.  It never ceases to amaze me how I can start a chapter thinking one thing and come out the other side thinking something else entirely.  I ask myself questions about what needs to happen next, and a few days later, the answers come in ideas for action or ideas for Evan’s introspection.  I need to develop two or three more concert programs for him to work on after he returns home from Helsinki. 

I’ve begun work on chapter two.  I’ve known all along that this is the chapter in which Evan is punched with the problem for this book.  I began writing without a detailed outline, however.  I can’t work with a detailed outline.  My outlines are always very sketchy and more like suggestions or a series of questions.  I usually need to know where I’m going, also, so I have a relatively good idea how the chapter will end and where Evan will be.  This chapter began, to my surprise, with him reconnecting with Pierre, a character from book 2.  Nice.  I interrupted the writing to dig into my research file for photos of Finlandia Hall, for Mannerheimintie in Helsinki, and find that I need more. 

My goal for next month is to finish at least four chapters.  I write slowly, especially working on first drafts. 

Categories: Fiction · Updates · Writing
Tagged: ,

Composer Institute

October 27, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Research can sometimes take me to wonderful places.  One such is Orchestra Hall during the Minnesota Orchestra’s Composer Institute, which they present each year with partners the American Composers Forum, the American Music Center and the University of Minnesota School of Music. 

 Why’s a writer hanging out with a bunch of new music people? 

Conductor Evan Quinn, the main character of the Perceval novels, meets a composer, Owen te Kumara, in book 1 (Perceval).  I thought Owen would be a peripheral character, but then I kept hearing snippets of Bela Bartok’s Concerto for Orchestra and it would not leave my head.  A few months later, I stumbled onto the Composer Institute section of the Minnesota Orchestra’s website (on blogroll), and felt that eerie “clear as a bell” sensation that I needed to pay attention.  A month later, it all came together when I decided to attend my first Composer Institute reading rehearsals last year at the end of November.  Bartok wrote his Concerto for Orchestra in 1943 under commission from the Koussevitsky Music Foundation which was established by conductor Serge Koussevitsky (music director of the Boston Symphony Orchestra 1924-49), a staunch supporter of contemporary composers.  Koussevitsky and Bartok.  A conductor and a composer.  Evan and Owen.  It would be several more months before I figured out exactly what their relationship would be over the five books in the series, but I realized that attending the reading rehearsals last year might give me a wealth of material in support of my writing their relationship.  The big question at the time was how do conductors and composers work together?

This year, I had no big questions.  I decided to attend one day of reading rehearsals to double-check the conclusions I’d made last year.  So, this past Thursday, October 25, I spent the day at Orchestra Hall, observing the rehearsals.  Warm salmon pink dominates the auditorium’s decor.  Wood paneling covers the walls left and right of the stage while the back wall is an ice blue with white cubes of varying sizes sticking out like rocks in cement.  The acoustics in the hall are superb.  Osmo Vanska, the Minnesota Orchestra’s Music Director, walks onstage but waits in the first violin section until the introduction of the first composer is complete.  He wears black jeans and a black T-shirt.  The orchestra musicians wear street clothes and are relaxed but attentive and ready to work.

I watch the composers closely during the next hours.  A group of four is clustered behind a score on a music stand about four rows in front of me.  The other three composers sit each alone in other areas on the main floor.  During the rehearsals, they move around, listening to the music in different areas of the hall, listening for balance, or for something that’s not standing out and should.  For each work, its composer sticks close to the stage initially to field any questions from the musicians or Mr. Vanska, and there are questions.  At times, Mr. Vanska grabs the score, squats at the edge of the stage and talks to the composer.  I know from the Institute’s agenda that each composer has already had a meeting with Mr. Vanska about his or her score earlier in the week.  Now come the actual sounds and refining them.  The music challenges in tempos, rhythms, dynamics.  Vanska clarifies, counting out bars for percussion, for brass.  He works on the articulation of the sound at times.  And then there’s the volume, also.  “Can you hear the strings here?”  “Is the drum too loud?”  The composer is never far away.  Listening.  Following his/her score.  During a break, I spot a clarinetist homing in on a composer on the main floor to ask her a question about his part.

Despite breaks and lunch, by the end of the second rehearsal I’m exhausted.  I’ve filled pages in my notebook with observations, impressions and comments on the music.  I hear that one of the composers, Jacob Cooper, is writing a blog about the Composer Institute experience at www.newmusicbox.org.  I know from last year’s composer blog there that it will be an interesting read.  Then I hear that the Minnesota Orchestra website will have video of this year’s Institute also.  Excellent.  From my perspective, all wonderful ways to spark my memory, in addition to my notes, which I will type up and flesh out with fuller descriptions, and any ideas for further work.

Last night, I attended the Composer Institute concert, called “Future Classics!” performed by the Minnesota Orchestra and conducted by Mr. Vanska.  Melissa Ousley and Steve Seel from Minnesota Public Radio hosted.  And wow.  This was a peak experience.  The end result of the hours of hard rehearsal work on Thursday (and again Friday morning) was brilliant.  I love new music.  I love being in on the beginning, hearing these sounds performed in concert for the first time.  Each composer spoke with Ousley before his/her work was performed, talking about inspirations, titles, insights into the creative process.  Only one composer had used literature as inspiration — a character, Odradek, from Franz Kafka’s short story “The Cares of a Family Man.” 

Toward the end of the first half, I began thinking of Evan and Owen, what their rehearsals and concert will be like in book 5.  There will be at least one rehearsal, most likely the first rehearsal, but I don’t know yet how much of the concert I’ll write.  But I know that my experiences observing the Composer Institute reading rehearsals last year and this past week, and attending the concert, will inform Evan’s and Owen’s experiences working together in the novels. 

Although I believe my research in this area, conductor working with composer, is finished, I still look forward to next year’s Composer Institute and more new music at Orchestra Hall.       

Categories: Classical Music · Conductors · Fiction · Research · Updates
Tagged: , ,

Updates

October 20, 2007 · 1 Comment

Writing:

I am almost finished writing chapter 1 of book 3: Perceval in Love.  This chapter proved more complex than I’d originally thought — isn’t that usually the case? — and I’m happy that I’d done a sketchy outline of the book to know what issues to present or hint at in the first chapter.  Of course, I’ll probably return to this chapter many times as I’m writing my way through this book, but I’m confident that now I’m on track for writing toward the end of the story.  The curtain has risen on Act One….

I need to develop programs of concerts Evan will be conducting after the two gigs in book 3 because he’ll be preparing for them during this book.  I need to know what he’ll be working on.

Research:

I’ve obtained permission to attend the Minnesota Orchestra’s reading rehearsals during the Composer Institute next week.  I plan to go to the first day, which is a double rehearsal day — morning and afternoon rehearsals — but not the dress rehearsal the following day.   I will go to the concert on Friday evening (which, I believe, will stream live on MPR.org at 8PM CT — check the website for details).  Last year, attending the reading rehearsals provided a wealth of material for my research regarding conductors and composers working together. 

Categories: Classical Music · Conductors · Fiction · Research · Updates · Writing
Tagged: , , , ,

Why the Future?

October 20, 2007 · Leave a Comment

A recent question from a friend about the time period of Perceval prompted me to review my thinking again.  Why set Perceval in the future?  It’s inconvenient for research, for example, and I don’t own a crystal ball.  It can be difficult.  Why make writing harder than it already is?

In the first draft of Perceval, the story existed in a non-specific time and I made no effort to anchor it in a time period.  It could have been occurring at any time — yesterday, today, tomorrow.  I didn’t want to risk readers mistaking the story in any way for science fiction or dystopian science fiction.  However, I wanted to create a different world in which America had lost its democracy through the democratic political process, i.e. the population had voted in a government that proceeded to dismantle the representative democracy in favor of security (my thinking pre-9/11).  Or at least that’s what the politicians would say.  The forces behind the dismantling would be actually paranoia, greed and the lust for power and control.  All the usual suspects.

As a reference, I was thinking initially of the Soviet Union’s communist and totalitarian system as my template, revised to fit American culture and society.  I wanted to explore how an American would respond to oppression, an American who had also knowledge and some experience of a democratic and free America.  I think human beings have an innate desire for freedom, and even those who want power over others may, sometimes, experience their position of power as freedom, just as some people regard wealth as freedom.  I also wanted to explore what would happen with the arts in America, specifically music in all its forms.

How would an American musician or writer or artist survive?  How would he respond to the society?  How would the oppressors respond to him?  I wanted Evan Quinn to react to oppression and the forces behind it as an American musician and artist.  Then I wanted him to leave America and have to start over in a democratic and free foreign culture and society, much like the Russian emigrants I’d met over the years who had left the known to be free in the unknown.  One Russian emigrant told me that when he arrived in America, he’d felt like he’d lost all his experience, and that really stuck with me.  The Russian also had had the rude realization that American society was not much like what he’d observed from afar.  How would an American react in such a situation?

Early readers of the novel complained that they didn’t know when the story took place, so I decided to take the plunge and set the story in the future.  This challenged me to create a future world, not just a future America, and gave me the opportunity to explore my ideas of an oppressive America, and trends in politics, culture, and economics that I hadn’t considered earlier.  I also established some rules for myself:

  • The future is not a character in this story.
  • This story is not science fiction or focused on futuristic technology.
  • There will be no extraterrestrials.
  • This is Evan’s story.  He is the “no tech” or human focus.

 But when in the future?  I wanted it to be a recognizable world, one in which a reader could easily see himself and feel comfortable.  The movie, Star Trek: First Contact, influenced my thinking.  In the movie, the USS Enterprise and her crew, residents of the 24th century, chase the Borg back to the 21st century and the days immediately prior to earth’s “first contact” with aliens.  This moment in time is after the Third World War which had devastated much of the planet.  But what had caused the Third World War?  This question led me to the year in which the action in my novel would occur, 2048, immediately prior to the Third World War mentioned in Star Trek: First Contact. 

Choosing the future as the time period for the Perceval novels challenged my imagination and created possibilities for the world I wanted for Evan Quinn that would not have existed if I’d set the novels in the past or present.  And, it turned out that researching the future was possible…. 

Categories: Fiction · Writing
Tagged: , , ,