Anatomy of Perceval

Musing on Hybrids

August 16, 2008 · 5 Comments

Hybrid cars are hot right now.  I’ve been thinking that car manufacturers have had no problem with marketing them, either, despite their hybrid status.  But then, they have a compelling primary consumer benefit: save money on gas and get incredible mileage while helping the environment.  As a result, the market has embraced hybrid cars with, if not passion, then enthusiasm.

As I prepare to research more literary agents to send out more queries, I am revisiting the question of what kind of novel I’ve written.  The Perceval novels blend genres: with their strength in character development, they are literary but I am more concerned about story than language; the future setting and focus on social issues place them in the social science fiction category; and they have other genre elements such as thriller (the secret of Perceval), crime (murders are committed), psychological suspense (who is Evan and what will he do?), international espionage (a rogue CIA agent and other “spies”), a dash of political intrigue (how Perceval will change the geopolitical situation), laced with mystery much as real life is.

During previous research into agents and publishers, reading Publishers Weekly religiously, attending workshops led by agents and/or writers, and digging through other market reference books, I learned that to categorize a novel as a “blend of genres” is the kiss of death.  Why? 

Marketing.  Publishers and booksellers want to be able to categorize books so that customers can find them easily and buy them, hence, the sections in bookstores.  It makes sense.  Customers who prefer literary fiction to popular have their own section, and the genres under popular fiction have theirs, nonfiction has its own section with subsections.  I’ve wondered on occasion, when I’ve been in a bookstore, what would happen if only two categories existed: fiction and nonfiction.  In each section, booksellers would shelve books alphabetically by author last name.  Then genre novels would mix in with literary novels and maybe people would read more of both.

I’ve also wondered, as I’ve browsed in bookstores, if it would really be such a hardship to create another category called “hybrid fiction.”  (Or even “hybrid nonfiction” — an article in the Foreword section of the March 24, 2008 Publishers Weekly  discussed the blending of fiction and nonfiction as a new phenomenon in writing.)  A hybrid fiction section might be small at the beginning, but once writers understood that this category existed, more would produce hybrids, expanding the consumers’ reading choices.  Is the reading public ready for a “new” genre?  Why not?  As long as the story is strong, the characters fascinating and real, and the subject interesting, does it really matter what category the novel is in?  Really, only for sales and marketing purposes….

If life were a novel, in what category would a bookseller shelve it?

Categories: Fiction · Marketing · Writing
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

5 responses so far ↓

  • Matt’s Bookosphere 8/16/08 « Enter the Octopus // August 17, 2008 at 3:32 am | Reply

    [...] Musing on hybrids (genre) [...]

  • Chad Aaron Sayban // August 18, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Reply

    I agree. There seems to be far too much emphasis in the publishing industry on making books fit into neat categories that they can easily market rather than trying to market great stories that might defy categorization. I think that is why a lot of authors first have success with a genre story and then – once their name is marketable – their writing heads in a different direction to what they really want to write. I’ve never been stuck to a particular genre with my reading. I want a good story that takes me somewhere I have never been before.

  • Elizabeth T. // August 22, 2008 at 5:10 am | Reply

    Live = Science Fiction / Fantasy.

    While the classification is important, and even necessary for a bookstore, it sometimes leaves me lost. I occasionally find something in a very different section than I would have expected. “Outlander” (D. Gabaldon) – in romance, not historical fiction. At what point does the central love story make something “romance” rather than just fiction? In this case, I utterly believe it was simply marketing. the story is probably much more likely to appeal to those already reading the tons of romance stories set in Regency England or earlier Scotland, etc.

    Perhaps the publishers would be better served (well, okay, maybe I would be, too), if they used key words, like peer reviewed scientific journals do. Interested in dry deposition of radioactive particulates? Use the search engine and put ‘dry deposition’ in the key-word-search. Then I don’t need to try to guess which journal it’s in. I.e., I wouldn’t need to guess if it’s in a journal about general environmental science, air chemistry, physics, nuclear physics, nuclear environmenal chemistry, etc.

    Using Outlander, again as the example, the key words Scotland, Jacobean, historical fiction, romance will likely result in an astronomical list of books. But Outlander would be in the list. And, if that was my interest, the publisher would have greater assurance of the publication getting my attention than if it sits in the romance section, which I don’t generally visit.

    I find the applicaiton of the categories or genre names confusing. Vampires have become popular in pop literature. Where are the books with vampires? Many are in SciFi/Fantasy. Why not in mystery, when the core of the story is a murder mystery? Vampires make it Fantasy? Anne Rice’s books, though are in the general fiction section. Again, a set of key words, or “tags” would help. Probably easier than my other suggestion, put copies of the books in each section which would be applicable. (not very practical, I realize).

  • Elizabeth T. // August 22, 2008 at 5:12 am | Reply

    ooops. just hit “submit” without proof reading. ooooops.

    I meant “Life” = SciFi/Fantasy. I’m sure I didn’t mean any of the grammatical errors, either.

    Sleep. sleep sleep perchance to dream. Of something other than my cat talking to me demanding to know why the litter box hasn’t been cleaned frequently enough.

  • devonellington // August 28, 2008 at 8:56 pm | Reply

    I read more and more books that are truly cross-genre and hybrids. Of course, if they’re written by a women, they’re always dumped in “romance”.

    I agree — there should be a “hybrid fiction” section — it would be fascinating to browse and be able to find unusual mixes.

    I’m tired of this tendency to “box” everything because those making the decisions don’t want to think. If I’m going to put down money, the person I’m giving it to should respect it enough to earn it (and I mean the stores and marketing people, not the writers).

Leave a Comment